viernes, 28 de enero de 2011

Writing

Read this fragment and give us your opinion

"The advocates of evolution are unable to adduce fossil intermediate forms which show an actual historical process of evolution of new kinds of organisms. They have failed to devise scientific theories which really explain evolution, and they cannot demonstrate the evolution of anything new by any known genetic mechanism or process. Furthermore, there is no evidence which proves that the alleged evolution of all life really occurred. Throughout the history of the world no new complex design has been observed to originate except from an intelligent mind. In the absence of an evolutionary explanation, divine special creation remains as the only scientifically viable explanation for the origin of life and of all biological designs."

Charles Robert Darwin Vs. Jean Baptiste Lamark




Now, answer these questions:


1) What is the theory that defends each scientist?
2) Where was Lamarck born?
3) What is the biggest difference that these theories show?
4) According to Lamarck's theory, what happened to the short-necked giraffe? What would  Darwin say?
5) For you, Which theory is the most reliable? Why? Give us your opinion.

Biography (February 12, 1809 – April 19, 1882)

Charles Darwin was born on February 12, 1809. Charles was preceded by Marianne, Caroline, Susan, and his best boyhood friend and only brother, Erasmus, and then Emily came along afterward.
Charles was the son of Robert Darwin, a prosperous physician and industrial financier. Robert was the son of the famous physician-poet-evolutionist Erasmus Darwin. Today we remember Charles and forget Erasmus, but for nearly the first three decades of Charles’ life, he was Erasmus Darwin’s grandson--the grandson of England’s most famous evolutionist (or transmutationist, as it was then called). 
Charles imbibed the theory from his grandfather and father. Although Erasmus died before his grandson was born, Charles carefully studied his grandfather’s evolutionary treatise, the Zoonomia, sometime in the mid-1820s, long before he stepped on the HMS Beagle. Robert Darwin affirmed transmutationism as well, although he kept his opinions to himself.
So, when Charles Darwin was hurried off to medical school at Edinburgh in 1825, he was already well-versed in evolutionary theory. When he got there, he soon realized that he wasn’t cut out for medicine. Rather than spend time on his studies, he began working under the transmutationist, Robert Grant, and generally had a good time, riding, shooting, eating, and acting the young gentleman.
It soon became clear to his father, that Charles was failing at the family vocation of medicine. It was decided that, as a last resort, he might cut it as an Anglican parson with a country parish. Few demands, a fair living, and lots of time for shooting, running dogs, hunting, and amateur natural history. Darwin shuffled off to Cambridge in January of 1828 to get an undergraduate degree in preparation for more advanced study to become a man of the cloth.
At Cambridge Charles met two very important Anglican priests who were also top scientists, John Henslow and Adam Sedgwick. Under their kind tutelage, Charles was probably as close to a theist as he ever would become, although the effect of their guidance and passion for science was to confirm Charles’ vocation as a naturalist rather than a country parson. It was, in fact, Henslow that arranged for Darwin to join Captain Robert FitzRoy on the HMS Beagle after his graduation from Cambridge in 1831. After long delays, the Beagle launched from England’s shores on December 27, 1831 to sail around the world collecting and measuring for the enhancement of Britain’s place as a growing world mercantile power.
Right away Darwin got seasick. He was sick nearly the whole time he was at sea during the Beagle's five-year voyage. 
Darwin spent the two decades after the Beagle cementing his place in England’s scientific society. He lived a kind of intellectual double life, gaining public respectability by his non-evolutionary scientific work, even while he was working away, right from the very beginning, at his theory of evolution in private. As his private notebooks make clear, from 1838 on Darwin was bent on making a purely materialistic, reductionist account of evolution, one that completely eliminated the need for divine intervention and oversight.
By this time, he had largely lost any faint traces of theism that he may have gained at Cambridge, and had fallen back into the Darwin hereditary religious skepticism bordering on atheism. After he proposed to his cousin Emma Wedgwood, he was honest enough to tell her of his unbelief. She was heartbroken, but married him anyway at the beginning of 1839. They would have a long and happy marriage despite their deepest mismatch about God, and would bring ten new Darwins into the world, only seven of which would live beyond childhood.
Although as an heir to the Darwin fortune, Charles didn’t have to work, he threw himself into developing his scientific career and his theory with such zeal that he was always teetering on ruining his already fragile health. He wanted his theory to be perfect, perfectly argued and perfectly backed up by endless facts. He was also afraid of the backlash against him if he published so radical a theory, which the public already associated with atheism.
Who knows how long he would have worked on his theory without publishing if he hadn’t received a surprise in June of 1858: a clear and concise account of evolution by natural selection that couldn’t have been a more accurate synopsis of Darwin’s own. It was written by Alfred Russel Wallace. He’d been scooped! Darwin was crestfallen.
The truth was that evolution had been in the air for some time, and many others had been working along the same lines as Darwin. Wallace was just one of them. The two issued a joint paper, read at Linnean Society on the first of July, 1858. Wallace was still overseas. Darwin was not there either. His youngest boy, Charles junior, had died at the end of June, the last of the Darwin children and the third child to die before adulthood. The dark side of the survival of the fittest.
Darwin began working feverishly on a full statement of his theory, but ended up writing what he considered a mere synopsis, The Origin of Species, publishing it in November of 1859. It shocked the public, not because evolution was new, but because Darwin was an already well-known and respected scientist whose work had been heralded among the conservative British scientific society. He was a turncoat, not a revolutionary.
Immediately upon publishing, he threw himself into an enormous international effort to have his theory affirmed, pulling every string available. Four men were particularly influential as his helpmates in this endeavor: Charles Lyell, Asa Gray, Thomas Huxley, and Joseph Hooker. Along with his co-discover, Alfred Wallace, they strove to make Darwinism respectable.
Ironically, three of these men--Lyell, Gray, and Wallace--affirmed evolution but thought that natural selection alone was radically insufficient to account for man’s moral and intellectual nature. Evolution needed God. Their “defection” so peeved Darwin that he wrote another book, The Descent of Man (1871), in which he made his case that our moral, intellectual, and “spiritual” aspects are all derived from natural and sexual selection. Evolution did not need God, thank you.
The cost for reducing our moral nature to an effect of natural selection was high. It meant that “morality” is merely the name we give for any particular existing society’s habits and social structures. Whatever these are—polygamy, monogamy, cannibalism, infanticide, gentlemanly behavior, courage, compassion toward all or just toward members of one’s tribe—they must have contributed to the survival of that society via natural selection. Furthermore, if natural selection is the root of all morality, and fitness is the criterion for evolutionary success, then, as Darwin rightly concluded, society should not allow the unfit to breed. Interesting thought from a perpetually sick man, whose own ten children inherited his physical weaknesses.
Darwin spent the rest of his life working on more specialized monographs that supported his theory and answering his critics with successive editions of the Origin of Species. On April 19, 1882 death, the great creative force of evolution, finally came to call on Charles Darwin. Hooker, Huxley, and Wallace were among the pallbearers to his final resting place in Westminster Abbey next to Sir John Herschel, the famed astronomer who rejected Darwinism, near the eminent Charles Lyell who would only accept a modified form of it, and close to Sir Isaac Newton whom it would have horrified.


A) Please, make the following test.

1. When was Darwin born?
a) December 27 th, 1831
b) February  12 th, 1809
c) February  27 th, 1809

2. Who was his grandfather?
a) Erasmus Darwin
b) Robert Darwin
c) Jacinto Darwin

3. In 1825 he went to the scoohl of ...
a) Biology
b) Maths
c) Medicine

4. When did he get his degree?
a) 1828
b)1831
c)1830

5. Where was he for 5 years?
a) In the Medicine Shcool of Cabridge
b) In a seminar
c) In a ship

6. Whom did he get married in 1839?
a) Wtih his cousin Emma Wedwood
b) With his cousin Caroline Wedwood
c) With his sister Emma Wedwood

7. What did Alfred Russel Wallace write in 1858?
a) A concise account of natural selection that couldn't been more  acurate of Dawin's own
b) A summary of Darwin's theory with  which he was crestfallen
c) A memo to remember Darwin that he must brush his teeth

8. What was the reason why Darwin focused on his studies and wrote the theory of species?
a) The death of his third son Charles
b) His return of the  journey in the Beagle
c) The death of his littles son, who was the third child to die

9. Which is stated in his second work the "Descent of man"?
a) He said that our moral, intelectual and spiritual aspects  all derived from natural and sexual selection.
b) He exposed that natural selection was insuficient to account from man's moral and intelectual nature
c) He exposed that Evolution needs God

10. What was Charles Darwin's religion?
a) Christianity
b) Anglicanism
c) He was atheist

B) And now search a synonym of these words that appear in the biography

a) Nearly                     b) Parson                   c) Oversight
d) Zeal                        e) Theory 

viernes, 21 de enero de 2011

MEMO

Date: Friday
To: 1r LAICQ
From: Damaris and Iara
Subject: Famous scientist's blog


This memo is to advise you that our blog will be ready the following Wednesday.
We choose Chales Darwin as a famous scientist of the Evolucionism.
Our objective is that you may know something about this great scientist, who was one of the more important in the XIX century, and whose theory mean a big step in the history of the biology science.
We ask for that you help us to improve this blog, for this please make sure that you follow this steps:
-Read this memo
-Read the biography
-Answer the question that we will ask you
-See the video
-Answer the questions
-Write your opinion (this is the most important step for us)
We are grateful that you have visited our blog.

Damaris and Iara